Triple
T16151522
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joseph Frontiero |
E391919
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectOf |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Frontiero v. Richardson decision |
E88590
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Frontiero v. Richardson decision | Statement: [Joseph Frontiero, subjectOf, Frontiero v. Richardson decision]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Frontiero v. Richardson decision Context triple: [Joseph Frontiero, subjectOf, Frontiero v. Richardson decision]
-
A.
Frontiero v. Richardson
chosen
Frontiero v. Richardson is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that advanced gender equality by striking down federal benefit rules that discriminated against female military service members.
-
B.
Rostker v. Goldberg
Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
-
C.
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
-
D.
Olmstead v. United States
Olmstead v. United States was a 1928 U.S. Supreme Court case that held warrantless wiretapping did not violate the Fourth Amendment, a stance later curtailed by modern privacy jurisprudence.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1c65e48190aa2b4c472e9bafc4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e21d981950819087fdacc7879dca97 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:46 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a001f83f6ac8190b9f18fe701a9b3ce |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:01 a.m.