Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Frontiero v. Richardson decision of the U.S. Supreme Court | Statement: [Sharron A. Frontiero, subjectOf, Frontiero v. Richardson decision of the U.S. Supreme Court]

Target entity: Frontiero v. Richardson decision of the U.S. Supreme Court
Context triple: [Sharron A. Frontiero, subjectOf, Frontiero v. Richardson decision of the U.S. Supreme Court]

• A. Frontiero v. Richardson chosen
  Frontiero v. Richardson is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that advanced gender equality by striking down federal benefit rules that discriminated against female military service members.
• B. Rostker v. Goldberg
  Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
• C. Olmstead v. United States
  Olmstead v. United States was a 1928 U.S. Supreme Court case that held warrantless wiretapping did not violate the Fourth Amendment, a stance later curtailed by modern privacy jurisprudence.
• D. Plyler v. Doe
  Plyler v. Doe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states cannot deny free public education to children based on their immigration status, recognizing such exclusion as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
• E. Bolling v. Sharpe
  Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.