Triple

T16149988
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject LCL E391884 entity
Predicate textLanguageSide P103974 FINISHED
Object original text on left page LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: original text on left page | Statement: [LCL, textLanguageSide, original text on left page]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: textLanguageSide
Context triple: [LCL, textLanguageSide, original text on left page]
  • A. hasLanguageOfSide chosen
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language on a specific side or aspect (e.g., one side of a bilingual object or interface).
  • B. languageOnBothSides
    Indicates that the same language is used or present on both sides of a given relationship, boundary, or comparison.
  • C. primaryLanguageSide2
    Indicates that the second entity in the relationship uses or is associated with the primary language specified.
  • D. languageIndependence
    Indicates that a concept, method, or representation does not depend on any specific programming or natural language and can be applied uniformly across different languages.
  • E. primaryLanguageSide1
    Indicates that the specified language is the main or dominant language associated with the first participant or side in a relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1c65e48190aa2b4c472e9bafc4 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e21d9724808190a8332987583a345a completed April 17, 2026, 11:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e182885bc08190822ae7e8a4b8ac1f completed April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:01 a.m.