Triple

T16142669
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rim Fire E391699 entity
Predicate fullContainmentPercentage P121273 FINISHED
Object 100% LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 100% | Statement: [Rim Fire, fullContainmentPercentage, 100%]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fullContainmentPercentage
Context triple: [Rim Fire, fullContainmentPercentage, 100%]
  • A. containedWith
    Indicates that one entity is located or kept inside the bounds or interior space of another entity.
  • B. hasContainment
    Indicates that one entity spatially or logically encloses, includes, or holds another within its bounds.
  • C. containsMostOf
    Indicates that one entity includes the majority (but not necessarily all) of the substance, elements, or components of another entity.
  • D. alsoContains
    Indicates that something includes, in addition to its primary contents, another specified element or component.
  • E. typicallyContain
    Indicates that one entity is normally or commonly found within, included in, or held by another entity under usual circumstances.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1c65e48190aa2b4c472e9bafc4 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e21d9082588190bc7e6ff491f0d94e completed April 17, 2026, 11:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e182885bc08190822ae7e8a4b8ac1f completed April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e1835b64948190ae1d2a9d4cc64acf completed April 17, 2026, 12:48 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:01 a.m.