Triple
T16115590
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. |
E390993
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | AID v. AOSI |
E390993
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: AID v. AOSI | Statement: [Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., alsoKnownAs, AID v. AOSI]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: AID v. AOSI Context triple: [Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., alsoKnownAs, AID v. AOSI]
-
A.
Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
chosen
Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the government cannot require organizations receiving federal funds to adopt a specific ideological position as a condition of funding, under the First Amendment.
-
B.
Ogden v. Saunders
Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
-
C.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
D.
Stack v. Boyle
Stack v. Boyle is a 1951 U.S. Supreme Court case that established constitutional limits on excessive bail in the context of prosecutions under the Smith Act.
-
E.
Hague v. CIO
Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2016a9dd48190bca3f58778ed865f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.