Triple
T16115522
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant |
E390991
|
entity |
| Predicate | allegation |
P9856
|
FINISHED |
| Object | American Express used its monopoly power in the charge-card market to impose anticompetitive tying arrangements on merchants. |
E313465
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: American Express used its monopoly power in the charge-card market to impose anticompetitive tying arrangements on merchants. | Statement: [American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, allegation, American Express used its monopoly power in the charge-card market to impose anticompetitive tying arrangements on merchants.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: American Express used its monopoly power in the charge-card market to impose anticompetitive tying arrangements on merchants. Context triple: [American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, allegation, American Express used its monopoly power in the charge-card market to impose anticompetitive tying arrangements on merchants.]
-
A.
Robinson-Patman Act
The Robinson-Patman Act is a U.S. federal antitrust law enacted in 1936 that targets price discrimination by large sellers to protect small businesses and promote fair competition.
-
B.
United States antitrust law
chosen
United States antitrust law is the body of federal and state legislation and case law designed to promote competition and prevent monopolistic practices, price-fixing, and other forms of anti-competitive behavior in the American economy.
-
C.
Antimonopoly Act
The Antimonopoly Act is Japan’s primary competition law that prohibits monopolistic practices, unfair trade restraints, and abuse of market power to promote fair and free competition.
-
D.
Antitrust
Antitrust is a 2001 techno-thriller film about a young programmer who uncovers sinister corporate conspiracies in the high-stakes world of software development.
-
E.
Act against Restraints of Competition
The Act against Restraints of Competition is Germany’s primary antitrust law governing the prevention of cartels, abuse of market dominance, and other anti-competitive practices.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2016a9dd48190bca3f58778ed865f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.