Triple
T16115289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maryland v. King |
E390986
|
entity |
| Predicate | stateStatuteAtIssue |
P10245
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Maryland DNA Collection Act
The Maryland DNA Collection Act is a state law that governs when and how law enforcement in Maryland may collect and use DNA samples from individuals arrested or charged with certain crimes, and was the central statute reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Maryland v. King.
|
E390986
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maryland DNA Collection Act | Statement: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Maryland DNA Collection Act Context triple: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
-
A.
DNA Identification Act of 1994
The DNA Identification Act of 1994 is a U.S. federal law that authorized the creation and regulation of a national DNA database for law enforcement purposes.
-
B.
State DNA Index System
The State DNA Index System is a statewide database that stores DNA profiles from offenders, arrestees, and crime scenes, serving as the intermediate level between local DNA databases and the national CODIS system in the United States.
-
C.
Maryland v. King
Maryland v. King is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of collecting DNA samples from individuals arrested for serious offenses under the Fourth Amendment.
-
D.
Maryland v. Wirtz
Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
-
E.
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 is a U.S. federal law that prohibits discrimination in health insurance and employment based on individuals’ genetic information.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Maryland DNA Collection Act Triple: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
Generated description
The Maryland DNA Collection Act is a state law that governs when and how law enforcement in Maryland may collect and use DNA samples from individuals arrested or charged with certain crimes, and was the central statute reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Maryland v. King.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Maryland DNA Collection Act Target entity description: The Maryland DNA Collection Act is a state law that governs when and how law enforcement in Maryland may collect and use DNA samples from individuals arrested or charged with certain crimes, and was the central statute reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Maryland v. King.
-
A.
DNA Identification Act of 1994
The DNA Identification Act of 1994 is a U.S. federal law that authorized the creation and regulation of a national DNA database for law enforcement purposes.
-
B.
State DNA Index System
The State DNA Index System is a statewide database that stores DNA profiles from offenders, arrestees, and crime scenes, serving as the intermediate level between local DNA databases and the national CODIS system in the United States.
-
C.
Maryland v. King
chosen
Maryland v. King is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of collecting DNA samples from individuals arrested for serious offenses under the Fourth Amendment.
-
D.
Maryland v. Wirtz
Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
-
E.
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 is a U.S. federal law that prohibits discrimination in health insurance and employment based on individuals’ genetic information.
- F. None of above.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stateStatuteAtIssue Context triple: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
-
A.
stateLawAtIssue
chosen
Indicates that a particular state law is the subject of dispute, analysis, or determination in a given legal context or case.
-
B.
statuteInvolved
Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
-
C.
statuteName
Indicates the specific legal statute or act by which something is formally designated, governed, or referenced.
-
D.
stateLawRepresentedBy
Indicates that a particular state law is formally represented or advocated by a specified legal document, body, or representative entity.
-
E.
stateCitation
Indicates that one state formally references or cites another state, typically in a legal, regulatory, or documentary context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2016a9dd48190bca3f58778ed865f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ffec4898088190bed531e33418c7e5 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ffecce96508190a53f100e3207ebac |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1828518c48190a8ef3aaa46a1f639 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.