Triple

T16115289
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maryland v. King E390986 entity
Predicate stateStatuteAtIssue P10245 FINISHED
Object Maryland DNA Collection Act
The Maryland DNA Collection Act is a state law that governs when and how law enforcement in Maryland may collect and use DNA samples from individuals arrested or charged with certain crimes, and was the central statute reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Maryland v. King.
E390986 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maryland DNA Collection Act | Statement: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Maryland DNA Collection Act
Context triple: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
  • A. DNA Identification Act of 1994
    The DNA Identification Act of 1994 is a U.S. federal law that authorized the creation and regulation of a national DNA database for law enforcement purposes.
  • B. State DNA Index System
    The State DNA Index System is a statewide database that stores DNA profiles from offenders, arrestees, and crime scenes, serving as the intermediate level between local DNA databases and the national CODIS system in the United States.
  • C. Maryland v. King
    Maryland v. King is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of collecting DNA samples from individuals arrested for serious offenses under the Fourth Amendment.
  • D. Maryland v. Wirtz
    Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  • E. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
    The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 is a U.S. federal law that prohibits discrimination in health insurance and employment based on individuals’ genetic information.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Maryland DNA Collection Act
Triple: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
Generated description
The Maryland DNA Collection Act is a state law that governs when and how law enforcement in Maryland may collect and use DNA samples from individuals arrested or charged with certain crimes, and was the central statute reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Maryland v. King.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Maryland DNA Collection Act
Target entity description: The Maryland DNA Collection Act is a state law that governs when and how law enforcement in Maryland may collect and use DNA samples from individuals arrested or charged with certain crimes, and was the central statute reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Maryland v. King.
  • A. DNA Identification Act of 1994
    The DNA Identification Act of 1994 is a U.S. federal law that authorized the creation and regulation of a national DNA database for law enforcement purposes.
  • B. State DNA Index System
    The State DNA Index System is a statewide database that stores DNA profiles from offenders, arrestees, and crime scenes, serving as the intermediate level between local DNA databases and the national CODIS system in the United States.
  • C. Maryland v. King chosen
    Maryland v. King is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of collecting DNA samples from individuals arrested for serious offenses under the Fourth Amendment.
  • D. Maryland v. Wirtz
    Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  • E. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
    The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 is a U.S. federal law that prohibits discrimination in health insurance and employment based on individuals’ genetic information.
  • F. None of above.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stateStatuteAtIssue
Context triple: [Maryland v. King, stateStatuteAtIssue, Maryland DNA Collection Act]
  • A. stateLawAtIssue chosen
    Indicates that a particular state law is the subject of dispute, analysis, or determination in a given legal context or case.
  • B. statuteInvolved
    Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
  • C. statuteName
    Indicates the specific legal statute or act by which something is formally designated, governed, or referenced.
  • D. stateLawRepresentedBy
    Indicates that a particular state law is formally represented or advocated by a specified legal document, body, or representative entity.
  • E. stateCitation
    Indicates that one state formally references or cites another state, typically in a legal, regulatory, or documentary context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e2016a9dd48190bca3f58778ed865f completed April 17, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 completed May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69ffec4898088190bed531e33418c7e5 completed May 10, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69ffecce96508190a53f100e3207ebac completed May 10, 2026, 2:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e1828518c48190a8ef3aaa46a1f639 completed April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.