Triple

T16115241
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject October Term 2011 E390985 entity
Predicate heardCase P75119 FINISHED
Object FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) E1170327 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) | Statement: [October Term 2011, heardCase, FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012)
Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012)]
  • A. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. chosen
    FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the FCC’s authority to change its indecency enforcement policies under a deferential standard of judicial review for agency policy shifts.
  • B. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
    FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
  • C. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
  • D. FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
    FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed restrictions on corporate-funded political issue ads, weakening parts of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act’s campaign finance limits.
  • E. United States v. AT&T
    United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e21a02172c8190978f7951ccd80928 completed April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 completed May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.