Triple
T16115239
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | October Term 2011 |
E390985
|
entity |
| Predicate | heardCase |
P75119
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Maples v. Thomas
Maples v. Thomas is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a death row inmate could overcome a procedural default because his attorneys had effectively abandoned him, constituting cause to excuse the default.
|
E1194035
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maples v. Thomas | Statement: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Maples v. Thomas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Maples v. Thomas Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Maples v. Thomas]
-
A.
Thomas v. Collins
Thomas v. Collins is a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that strengthened First Amendment protections for labor organizers by striking down a Texas law requiring union speakers to register before soliciting members.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
Gooding v. Wilson
Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Martin v. City of Struthers
Martin v. City of Struthers is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a city ordinance banning door-to-door leaflet distribution, reinforcing First Amendment protections for free speech and religious proselytizing.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Maples v. Thomas Triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Maples v. Thomas]
Generated description
Maples v. Thomas is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a death row inmate could overcome a procedural default because his attorneys had effectively abandoned him, constituting cause to excuse the default.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Maples v. Thomas Target entity description: Maples v. Thomas is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a death row inmate could overcome a procedural default because his attorneys had effectively abandoned him, constituting cause to excuse the default.
-
A.
Thomas v. Collins
Thomas v. Collins is a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that strengthened First Amendment protections for labor organizers by striking down a Texas law requiring union speakers to register before soliciting members.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
Gooding v. Wilson
Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Martin v. City of Struthers
Martin v. City of Struthers is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a city ordinance banning door-to-door leaflet distribution, reinforcing First Amendment protections for free speech and religious proselytizing.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e21a02172c8190978f7951ccd80928 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ffec4898088190bed531e33418c7e5 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ffecce96508190a53f100e3207ebac |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.