Triple
T16115235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | October Term 2011 |
E390985
|
entity |
| Predicate | heardCase |
P75119
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of routine strip searches for individuals arrested and detained in jail, even for minor offenses.
|
E1194032
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington | Statement: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington]
-
A.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
B.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
C.
Engblom v. Carey
Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
-
D.
Nebbia v. New York
Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Meredith v. Fair
Meredith v. Fair was a landmark federal court case that paved the way for James Meredith’s historic 1962 enrollment as the first Black student at the University of Mississippi, challenging entrenched racial segregation in higher education.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington Triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington]
Generated description
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of routine strip searches for individuals arrested and detained in jail, even for minor offenses.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington Target entity description: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of routine strip searches for individuals arrested and detained in jail, even for minor offenses.
-
A.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
B.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
C.
Engblom v. Carey
Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
-
D.
Nebbia v. New York
Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Meredith v. Fair
Meredith v. Fair was a landmark federal court case that paved the way for James Meredith’s historic 1962 enrollment as the first Black student at the University of Mississippi, challenging entrenched racial segregation in higher education.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e21a02172c8190978f7951ccd80928 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ffec4898088190bed531e33418c7e5 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ffecce96508190a53f100e3207ebac |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.