Triple

T16115233
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject October Term 2011 E390985 entity
Predicate heardCase P75119 FINISHED
Object Zivotofsky v. Clinton E903976 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zivotofsky v. Clinton | Statement: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Zivotofsky v. Clinton]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Zivotofsky v. Clinton
Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Zivotofsky v. Clinton]
  • A. Zivotofsky v. Clinton chosen
    Zivotofsky v. Clinton is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of the political question doctrine by allowing courts to review a dispute over the recognition of Jerusalem in U.S. passports.
  • B. INS v. Chadha
    INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
  • C. Missouri v. Holland
    Missouri v. Holland is a landmark 1920 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government’s power to implement international treaties through national legislation even in areas traditionally regulated by the states.
  • D. Chiafalo v. Washington
    Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
  • E. Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e21a02172c8190978f7951ccd80928 completed April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffebab779c8190b466c26f4024aa31 completed May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.