Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius | Statement: [October Term 2011, heardCase, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius]

Target entity: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius]

• A. NFIB v. Sebelius chosen
  NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
• B. Zubik v. Burwell
  Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
• C. King v. Burwell
  King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
• D. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
  Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
• E. Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
  Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas abortion restrictions as imposing an undue burden on women’s constitutional right to access abortion.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: heardCase
Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius]

• A. heardByCourt chosen
  Indicates that a matter, case, or issue has been formally considered or examined by a court.
• B. heard
  Indicates that one entity perceived a sound produced by another entity or source through hearing.
• C. hearsCasesAs
  Indicates that one judicial body or judge reviews and adjudicates cases originating from another court or jurisdiction.
• D. hearsAppealTo
  Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
• E. hearsCasesWith
  Indicates that one judicial body or judge conducts proceedings together with another judicial body or judge in hearing the same cases.
• F. None of above.