Triple
T16114824
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Super universas |
E390974
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesLegalFormulae |
P121528
|
FINISHED |
| Object | canonical erection of a diocese |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canonical erection of a diocese | Statement: [Super universas, usesLegalFormulae, canonical erection of a diocese]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesLegalFormulae Context triple: [Super universas, usesLegalFormulae, canonical erection of a diocese]
-
A.
usesLegalCode
Indicates that one entity applies, references, or operates under a particular legal code in its actions or regulations.
-
B.
legalExpressionOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the formal legal articulation, representation, or codified form of another entity (such as a right, obligation, or agreement).
-
C.
usesLegalMethod
Indicates that an action or process is carried out using methods that comply with applicable laws and legal standards.
-
D.
USLegalTerm
Indicates that the subject is a legal concept, status, or designation specifically defined or recognized under United States law.
-
E.
hasLegalDefinitionIn
Indicates that something possesses an official legal definition within a specified legal source, system, or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e20169ce488190bbc814f23a3b7547 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1828518c48190a8ef3aaa46a1f639 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e183b9d3f08190953ada68f4272996 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.