Triple

T16114295
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Arms of the Richelieu family E390962 entity
Predicate languageOfHeraldry P9680 FINISHED
Object French heraldry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French heraldry | Statement: [Arms of the Richelieu family, languageOfHeraldry, French heraldry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfHeraldry
Context triple: [Arms of the Richelieu family, languageOfHeraldry, French heraldry]
  • A. languageOfHistoricalBlazon
    Indicates the language in which a historical blazon (a formal heraldic description) is written or recorded.
  • B. notableHerald
    Indicates that one entity is a herald (messenger or announcer) of particular significance or prominence in relation to another entity.
  • C. coatOfArmsMotto
    Indicates the phrase or motto that appears on or is officially associated with a particular coat of arms.
  • D. coatOfArms
    Indicates that one entity serves as the heraldic emblem or coat of arms representing another entity.
  • E. heraldicTradition chosen
    Indicates a relationship where something belongs to, follows, or is characterized by a particular system or style of heraldic customs and practices.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e20169ce488190bbc814f23a3b7547 completed April 17, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e1828518c48190a8ef3aaa46a1f639 completed April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.