Triple
T16112391
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UNESCO World Heritage Site (Angra do Heroísmo) |
E390911
|
entity |
| Predicate | inscriptionNumber |
P121524
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 206 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 206 | Statement: [UNESCO World Heritage Site (Angra do Heroísmo), inscriptionNumber, 206]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inscriptionNumber Context triple: [UNESCO World Heritage Site (Angra do Heroísmo), inscriptionNumber, 206]
-
A.
inscriptionID
Indicates a unique identifier that links an entity to a specific inscription or inscribed text.
-
B.
inscriptionBy
Indicates that an inscription was created, written, or carved by a particular agent or entity.
-
C.
inscription
Indicates that text has been written, carved, or engraved onto a surface or object.
-
D.
inscriptionType
Indicates the specific kind or category of inscription associated with an entity (e.g., dedicatory, funerary, commemorative).
-
E.
inscriptionFeature
Indicates that one entity bears or contains an inscribed element or marking that is treated as a notable feature in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1a8dd881909f1de6ef78849874 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e20167ee1481909e56dc632bfc0fc5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1828518c48190a8ef3aaa46a1f639 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e183b9d3f08190953ada68f4272996 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.