Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996) | Statement: [Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, sourceCaseCitation, Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996)]

Target entity: Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996)
Context triple: [Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, sourceCaseCitation, Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996)]

• A. Romer v. Evans chosen
  Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
• B. Arizona v. Evans
  Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
• C. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
  R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a local hate-speech ordinance as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
• D. Rust v. Sullivan
  Rust v. Sullivan is a 1991 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal regulations prohibiting Title X family planning funds from being used in programs where abortion is provided or even discussed as a method of family planning.
• E. Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: sourceCaseCitation
Context triple: [Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, sourceCaseCitation, Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996)]

• A. legalCitation chosen
  Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
• B. legalCitationSystem
  Indicates a system or convention used to reference and identify legal authorities such as cases, statutes, or regulations.
• C. formerLegalCitation
  Indicates that one legal citation previously referred to or governed a matter but has since been replaced, superseded, or is no longer the current controlling citation.
• D. legalCitationNumber
  Indicates the specific identifying number assigned to a legal citation that references a law, case, or legal document.
• E. legalCitationType
  Indicates the specific kind or category of legal citation that characterizes the relationship between the citing and cited legal sources.
• F. None of above.