Triple
T16101797
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause |
E390637
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States constitutional law principle |
C11661
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: United States constitutional law principle Context triple: [Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, instanceOf, United States constitutional law principle]
-
A.
legal concept in United States law
chosen
A legal concept in United States law is an abstract principle, doctrine, or construct—such as due process, negligence, or equal protection—that structures how rights, duties, and liabilities are defined, interpreted, and enforced within the U.S. legal system.
-
B.
United States federal law
United States federal law is the body of statutes, regulations, and legal principles enacted or authorized by the federal government that governs nationwide matters under the U.S. Constitution.
-
C.
constitutional law topic
A constitutional law topic is a specific subject area concerning the interpretation, application, or structure of a nation's constitution, including the distribution of governmental powers and the protection of individual rights.
-
D.
United States legal category
A United States legal category is a formally defined classification used within the U.S. legal system to group persons, entities, actions, or matters for the purpose of applying specific laws, rights, obligations, or procedures.
-
E.
constitutional law standard
A constitutional law standard is a judicially developed test or criterion used by courts to evaluate whether government actions or laws comply with constitutional provisions and protections.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.