Triple
T16101795
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause |
E390637
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutional holding |
C35669
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: constitutional holding Context triple: [Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, instanceOf, constitutional holding]
-
A.
judicial holding
chosen
A judicial holding is the court’s essential legal determination on the specific issues necessary to resolve a case, which forms binding precedent for future similar disputes.
-
B.
constitutional law case
A constitutional law case is a legal dispute that requires a court to interpret and apply a nation's constitution to determine the validity of government actions, laws, or policies.
-
C.
constitutional law standard
A constitutional law standard is a judicially developed test or criterion used by courts to evaluate whether government actions or laws comply with constitutional provisions and protections.
-
D.
constitutional law
Constitutional law is the body of legal principles and rules that defines the structure, powers, and limits of government and protects fundamental rights under a nation's constitution.
-
E.
constitutional concept
A constitutional concept is an abstract legal and political idea that defines, structures, or constrains the organization, powers, and fundamental principles of a constitutional system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.