Triple
T16101740
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College |
E390635
|
entity |
| Predicate | appealsCourt |
P1031
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit |
E9782
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit | Statement: [Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, appealsCourt, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Context triple: [Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, appealsCourt, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]
-
A.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
chosen
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from federal district courts in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island.
-
B.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont and is known for its influential decisions in areas such as securities law, immigration, and constitutional rights.
-
C.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
-
D.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is a federal appellate court widely regarded as one of the most influential in the country, particularly in cases involving federal agencies and constitutional law.
-
E.
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts is a federal trial court with jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases arising under federal law in the state of Massachusetts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appealsCourt Context triple: [Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, appealsCourt, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]
-
A.
hearsAppealsIn
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
-
B.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
-
C.
appealsFrom
chosen
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
D.
higherCourtOf
Indicates that one court has legal authority to review, overrule, or supervise the decisions and actions of another, lower court in the judicial hierarchy.
-
E.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff68686481909517eed4266729ca |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffeba007c08190bf4d3cf092abc7dd |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e182804208819087f35307cd6e4103 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.