Triple

T16101701
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College E390635 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College E390635 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College | Statement: [Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, fullName, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
Context triple: [Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, fullName, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College]
  • A. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College chosen
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • B. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • C. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • D. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • E. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead elicitation completed
NER batch_69e1ff68686481909517eed4266729ca ner completed
NED1 batch_69ffeb9d6140819087f9b3dc549c4aec ned_source_triple completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.