Triple

T16098134
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Richie Cunningham E390538 entity
Predicate familyName P18 FINISHED
Object Cunningham E139353 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cunningham | Statement: [Richie Cunningham, familyName, Cunningham]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cunningham
Context triple: [Richie Cunningham, familyName, Cunningham]
  • A. Cunningham chosen
    Cunningham is a common Scottish surname borne by numerous notable individuals across fields such as technology, politics, sports, and the arts.
  • B. Cuninghamme
    Cuninghamme is an alternative historical or variant spelling of the surname Cunningham, a Scottish family name associated with the region of Ayrshire.
  • C. Cooley
    Cooley was a party in the landmark 1852 U.S. Supreme Court case Cooley v. Board of Wardens, which helped define the scope of state versus federal power over commerce.
  • D. Pittman
    Pittman is a surname of English origin borne by various notable individuals across politics, sports, and the arts.
  • E. Coney Weston
    Coney Weston is a small rural village and civil parish in the English county of Suffolk.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e1ff6551a48190afb7e0c61e22b541 completed April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffeb9b3e708190be822f7ed588c9da completed May 10, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m.