Triple
T16056656
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Humphry Osmond |
E389497
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfCoinedTerm |
P121450
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Humphry Osmond, languageOfCoinedTerm, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfCoinedTerm Context triple: [Humphry Osmond, languageOfCoinedTerm, English]
-
A.
coinedTerm
Indicates that an entity originated and introduced a particular term or expression into use.
-
B.
eponymLanguage
Indicates that a language is named after (is the eponym of) a particular person, place, or entity.
-
C.
languageTerm
Indicates that one entity is a linguistic expression (word, phrase, or term) used to denote or label the other entity.
-
D.
conceptCoinedFromName
Indicates that a concept was created or derived from a specific person's name.
-
E.
etymologicalLanguage
Indicates the language from which a word or term is historically derived in its etymology.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dae698881908327ef2d67706cb9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1858a00888190b8505071575dc56f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e18272f2288190a17d45fb01cc2b07 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e185879c10819080a18e24969b5a6d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:56 a.m.