Triple
T16046883
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polska Ludowa |
E389243
|
entity |
| Predicate | ważnaReformaAdministracyjna |
P5053
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reforma wojewódzka 1975 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reforma wojewódzka 1975 | Statement: [Polska Ludowa, ważnaReformaAdministracyjna, reforma wojewódzka 1975]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ważnaReformaAdministracyjna Context triple: [Polska Ludowa, ważnaReformaAdministracyjna, reforma wojewódzka 1975]
-
A.
notableReform
chosen
Indicates that an entity is recognized for having initiated, led, or been central to a significant reform or transformative change in a system, policy, or institution.
-
B.
partOfAdministrativeDivisionReform
Indicates that an entity is involved in, or results from, a reorganization or restructuring of administrative divisions.
-
C.
lastReform
Indicates the most recent reform or change that was applied to an entity, typically linking the entity to its latest reform event or version.
-
D.
municipalityReform
Indicates a formal reorganization or restructuring of a municipality’s administrative boundaries, governance, or status.
-
E.
reform
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dae698881908327ef2d67706cb9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff63edb0819092cbb671967bbdcd |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826f34c081908005bb736f1c485d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:56 a.m.