Triple
T16046839
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polska Ludowa |
E389243
|
entity |
| Predicate | ustrójPolityczny |
P121752
|
FINISHED |
| Object | demokracja ludowa |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: demokracja ludowa | Statement: [Polska Ludowa, ustrójPolityczny, demokracja ludowa]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ustrójPolityczny Context triple: [Polska Ludowa, ustrójPolityczny, demokracja ludowa]
-
A.
politicalIntegration
Indicates the process or degree to which separate political units, groups, or institutions become more unified, coordinated, or incorporated into a larger political framework.
-
B.
geopoliticalOrganization
Indicates that an entity functions as a political or governmental body associated with a specific geographic region or territory.
-
C.
objectivePoland
Indicates that something has Poland as its goal, target, or intended destination.
-
D.
politicalEntity
Indicates that an entity functions as or is recognized as a political unit, organization, or actor within a political system.
-
E.
politicalUnion
Indicates a formal relationship in which two or more political entities are joined under a shared governance or institutional framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dae698881908327ef2d67706cb9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff63edb0819092cbb671967bbdcd |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826f34c081908005bb736f1c485d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e1ff5cd7e481908a29214139a3de2e |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:56 a.m.