Triple
T16044212
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission ruling of 2002 |
E389173
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfArbitration |
P84998
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ad hoc boundary arbitration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ad hoc boundary arbitration | Statement: [Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission ruling of 2002, typeOfArbitration, ad hoc boundary arbitration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfArbitration Context triple: [Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission ruling of 2002, typeOfArbitration, ad hoc boundary arbitration]
-
A.
arbitrationMethod
chosen
Indicates the method or procedure used to conduct arbitration between parties in a dispute.
-
B.
methodOfDisputeResolution
Indicates the process or mechanism used to settle a disagreement or conflict between parties.
-
C.
divisionArbitratedBy
Indicates that the resolution or allocation of a division (e.g., of assets, responsibilities, or territory) is determined or settled by a specified arbitrating party or authority.
-
D.
arbitrationAwardedTo
Indicates that, as a result of an arbitration process, a decision or award has been granted in favor of a particular party.
-
E.
litigationType
Indicates the specific category or nature of a legal dispute or court case associated with an entity or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dae698881908327ef2d67706cb9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff63edb0819092cbb671967bbdcd |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826f34c081908005bb736f1c485d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:56 a.m.