Triple
T16043881
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Badme region |
E389165
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusDeterminedBy |
P15012
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission decision of 2002 |
E389173
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission decision of 2002 | Statement: [Badme region, legalStatusDeterminedBy, Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission decision of 2002]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission decision of 2002 Context triple: [Badme region, legalStatusDeterminedBy, Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission decision of 2002]
-
A.
Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission ruling of 2002
chosen
The Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission ruling of 2002 was an international legal decision that definitively demarcated the disputed border between Eritrea and Ethiopia following their 1998–2000 war.
-
B.
Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission
The Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission was an independent arbitral body established under international auspices to adjudicate claims and assign responsibility for damages arising from the Eritrean–Ethiopian War.
-
C.
Agreement between the Government of the State of Eritrea and the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
The Agreement between the Government of the State of Eritrea and the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia is a peace accord that formally ended the Eritrean–Ethiopian War and created mechanisms, including a claims commission, to resolve disputes arising from the conflict.
-
D.
Eritrea–Ethiopia border
The Eritrea–Ethiopia border is a historically disputed frontier in the Horn of Africa that has been the focus of intense territorial conflict and prolonged political tension between the two countries.
-
E.
Ethiopia–Djibouti border
The Ethiopia–Djibouti border is an international boundary in the Horn of Africa that cuts across the traditional homeland of the Afar people and connects landlocked Ethiopia to the port facilities of Djibouti.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusDeterminedBy Context triple: [Badme region, legalStatusDeterminedBy, Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission decision of 2002]
-
A.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
chosen
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
B.
legalStatusAtIssue
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
-
C.
legalStatusBefore
Indicates the legal condition or classification that applied to an entity prior to a specified event, change, or point in time.
-
D.
legalStatusVariesBy
Indicates that the legal status of something differs depending on a specified jurisdiction, context, or set of conditions.
-
E.
legalStatusOfAuthority
Indicates the legal status or standing that a particular authority holds within a given legal or regulatory framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dae698881908327ef2d67706cb9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff63edb0819092cbb671967bbdcd |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffe476d4488190abade3d6b4011435 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826f34c081908005bb736f1c485d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:56 a.m.