Triple
T16040452
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ATAM |
E389080
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | software architecture evaluation method |
C36882
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: software architecture evaluation method Context triple: [ATAM, instanceOf, software architecture evaluation method]
-
A.
software architecture concept
A software architecture concept is an abstract, high-level idea or pattern that defines how software system components are organized, interact, and evolve to meet functional and non-functional requirements.
-
B.
software architecture pattern
A software architecture pattern is a reusable, high-level design blueprint that defines the structure, interactions, and responsibilities of components within a software system to address recurring architectural problems.
-
C.
software development methodology
A software development methodology is a structured framework of principles, practices, and processes that guides how software is planned, designed, built, tested, and delivered.
-
D.
enterprise architecture framework
An enterprise architecture framework is a structured methodology that defines principles, models, and processes for aligning an organization’s business strategy, information systems, and technology infrastructure.
-
E.
software engineering organization
A software engineering organization is a structured group of people, processes, and tools dedicated to designing, building, testing, deploying, and maintaining software systems to meet specific business or user needs.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dada3808190825d5f80d72fbe88 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:56 a.m.