Triple
T16035016
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slim |
E388948
|
entity |
| Predicate | treatsWithRespect |
P37635
|
FINISHED |
| Object | all ranch workers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: all ranch workers | Statement: [Slim, treatsWithRespect, all ranch workers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treatsWithRespect Context triple: [Slim, treatsWithRespect, all ranch workers]
-
A.
mustRespect
chosen
Indicates that one entity is obligated to show respect or deference toward another entity.
-
B.
respectedAs
Indicates that one entity regards another with esteem or honor, recognizing their value, status, or authority.
-
C.
treatmentOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity administers, provides, or is responsible for a therapeutic intervention directed toward another entity (typically a patient or condition).
-
D.
holdsDignity
Indicates that an entity possesses or maintains a state of honor, respect, or moral worth in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
deviatesToRespect
Indicates that an entity intentionally diverges from a norm, rule, or expected course of action in order to show consideration, honor, or deference to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dada3808190825d5f80d72fbe88 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1ff63edb0819092cbb671967bbdcd |
completed | April 17, 2026, 9:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826f34c081908005bb736f1c485d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:56 a.m.