Triple
T1602945
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Financial fair play regulations |
E34435
|
entity |
| Predicate | allowsSanction |
P273
|
FINISHED |
| Object | warnings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: warnings | Statement: [Financial fair play regulations, allowsSanction, warnings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allowsSanction Context triple: [Financial fair play regulations, allowsSanction, warnings]
-
A.
requiresSanctioningBody
Indicates that an action, event, or decision must be approved or authorized by a designated sanctioning authority or governing body.
-
B.
typeOfSanction
Indicates the specific category or kind of sanction that is applied in a given situation.
-
C.
allows
chosen
Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
-
D.
allowedReturn
Indicates that an entity is permitted to be returned or sent back under specified conditions or rules.
-
E.
requiresSanctioningBodyRecognition
Indicates that an entity’s validity, operation, or status is contingent upon being formally recognized by an authorized sanctioning body.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885fea6a481909fe83ba6441f1774 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a95b02cd448190be8e3db9a5a7bac0 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 10:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907c1cad08190b9728dd557f39aa0 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.