Triple
T16016922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nobody Does It Better |
E388489
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryArtistStyle |
P45796
|
FINISHED |
| Object | G-funk crooning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: G-funk crooning | Statement: [Nobody Does It Better, primaryArtistStyle, G-funk crooning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryArtistStyle Context triple: [Nobody Does It Better, primaryArtistStyle, G-funk crooning]
-
A.
primaryArtist
Indicates that an entity is the main or lead artist responsible for a creative work, as opposed to supporting or contributing artists.
-
B.
primaryInstrumentalStyle
Indicates the main instrumental style or genre most closely associated with an entity’s musical performance or work.
-
C.
styleOfMusic
Indicates the musical genre or stylistic category that characterizes a piece of music, artist, or performance.
-
D.
primaryArtistNationality
Indicates the nationality associated with the main or primary artist involved in a work or context.
-
E.
hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic
chosen
Indicates that something possesses or exhibits a particular musical style as a defining characteristic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dabcb7c8190b6a39d6831d2fa1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1858a00888190b8505071575dc56f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826a4f7c8190aba6d4f1075141b0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:55 a.m.