Triple
T16014135
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hellegatsplaten |
E388417
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasManagementAspect |
P48261
|
FINISHED |
| Object | coastal defense |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: coastal defense | Statement: [Hellegatsplaten, hasManagementAspect, coastal defense]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasManagementAspect Context triple: [Hellegatsplaten, hasManagementAspect, coastal defense]
-
A.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
B.
hasTypeOfManagement
Indicates that an entity is associated with or operates under a specified form or style of management.
-
C.
hasManagementRelevance
chosen
Indicates that something is pertinent or significant to management activities, decisions, or responsibilities.
-
D.
hasManagementNeed
Indicates that an entity requires management, oversight, or intervention to address a particular condition, resource, or situation.
-
E.
hasManagementPlan
Indicates that an entity is associated with a defined management plan specifying how it should be overseen, maintained, or administered.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dabcb7c8190b6a39d6831d2fa1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1858a00888190b8505071575dc56f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826a4f7c8190aba6d4f1075141b0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:55 a.m.