Triple
T16011355
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ninjini |
E388342
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeUpgraded |
P103482
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Ninjini, canBeUpgraded, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeUpgraded Context triple: [Ninjini, canBeUpgraded, yes]
-
A.
mayBeUpgradedTo
Indicates that one entity is eligible or allowed to be changed into a higher, improved, or more advanced version represented by another entity.
-
B.
hasUpgrade
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with an improved or enhanced version of another entity.
-
C.
canBePoweredUp
Indicates that an entity has the capability to receive additional power or energy, enhancing its state or functionality.
-
D.
wasUpgradedFor
Indicates that one entity was improved, enhanced, or updated specifically to serve, benefit, or be compatible with another entity.
-
E.
upgradeable
chosen
Indicates that an entity can be improved or enhanced to a higher version, level, or capability.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dabcb7c8190b6a39d6831d2fa1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1858a00888190b8505071575dc56f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e1826a4f7c8190aba6d4f1075141b0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:55 a.m.