Triple
T16006878
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cascadia back-arc region |
E388241
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGeothermalFeatures |
P81464
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hot springs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hot springs | Statement: [Cascadia back-arc region, hasGeothermalFeatures, hot springs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGeothermalFeatures Context triple: [Cascadia back-arc region, hasGeothermalFeatures, hot springs]
-
A.
hasGeothermalPotential
Indicates that an entity possesses conditions suitable for generating or exploiting geothermal energy.
-
B.
hasHydrothermalActivity
chosen
Indicates that a location or geological feature exhibits hydrothermal activity, such as the circulation of heated water or fluids associated with geothermal processes.
-
C.
hasGeothermalField
Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a geothermal field.
-
D.
hasGeyser
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or features a geyser as part of its characteristics or composition.
-
E.
hasGeologicalActivity
Indicates that an entity exhibits or is associated with ongoing or past geological processes such as volcanism, tectonics, or seismic activity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86dabcb7c8190b6a39d6831d2fa1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e173b3bf6c81909230170e833d7ce7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142dc081c819082527e3fa8773460 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:55 a.m.