Triple
T15999159
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PC |
E388051
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHardwareConfiguration |
P13644
|
FINISHED |
| Object | desktop computer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: desktop computer | Statement: [PC, hasHardwareConfiguration, desktop computer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHardwareConfiguration Context triple: [PC, hasHardwareConfiguration, desktop computer]
-
A.
hasHardware
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is equipped with specific hardware components or devices.
-
B.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
-
C.
hasHardwareSeries
Indicates that one hardware item belongs to, or is categorized under, a particular hardware series or product line.
-
D.
hasConfiguration
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or defined by a particular configuration or setup.
-
E.
checksHardware
Indicates that one entity inspects or verifies the condition, presence, or correctness of another entity’s hardware components.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86daa562c81908aacc179c0fe8fb5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e173b3bf6c81909230170e833d7ce7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142dc081c819082527e3fa8773460 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:55 a.m.