Triple
T15974788
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Diogo Tavares |
E387416
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGivenName |
P17
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Diogo |
E155483
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Diogo | Statement: [Diogo Tavares, hasGivenName, Diogo]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Diogo Context triple: [Diogo Tavares, hasGivenName, Diogo]
-
A.
Diogo
chosen
Diogo is a masculine given name, commonly used in Portuguese-speaking countries and related to the name Diego.
-
B.
Diogo Cam
Diogo Cam is a variant spelling of Diogo Cão, the 15th-century Portuguese navigator and explorer known for his voyages along the west coast of Africa.
-
C.
Gonçalo
Gonçalo is a Portuguese given name, equivalent to the Spanish name Gonzalo and commonly used for males in Portuguese-speaking countries.
-
D.
Sebastião
Sebastião is the Portuguese variant of the given name Sebastian, commonly used in Portuguese-speaking countries.
-
E.
Damião
Damião is a Portuguese given name, equivalent to Damian, commonly used in Lusophone countries.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da94ccc819083d187f5dc6a123e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1572c216c81908f2070d2a87609c2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffbe8ce7788190a3e0aefc9a29d58a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:54 a.m.