Triple
T15946289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oneida County |
E386691
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBorderWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lewis County |
E222825
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lewis County | Statement: [Oneida County, hasBorderWith, Lewis County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lewis County Context triple: [Oneida County, hasBorderWith, Lewis County]
-
A.
Lewis County
Lewis County is a county in southwestern Washington State known for its rural communities, forests, and position between the Cascade Range and the Pacific Coast.
-
B.
Lewis County
chosen
Lewis County is a rural county in northern New York State known for its forests, outdoor recreation, and location within the Tug Hill Plateau region.
-
C.
Lewis County
Lewis County is a rural county in north-central Idaho known for its agricultural communities, forested landscapes, and small-town character.
-
D.
Mason County
Mason County is a rural county in central Texas known for its ranching, hunting, and the historic town of Mason.
-
E.
Mason County
Mason County is a county in western Washington State known for its forests, waterways, and location along the southern reaches of Puget Sound.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da882448190a82ea962fe343b79 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e156d1a4c08190afc325491ba38870 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a002d982788819082fcdd8ab5c80513 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:53 a.m.