Triple
T15944919
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dawro |
E386659
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAncestor |
P369
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Proto-Omotic |
E82601
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Proto-Omotic | Statement: [Dawro, hasAncestor, Proto-Omotic]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Proto-Omotic Context triple: [Dawro, hasAncestor, Proto-Omotic]
-
A.
Omotic languages
chosen
Omotic languages are a group of closely related languages spoken primarily in southwestern Ethiopia, often considered one of the most divergent branches of the Afroasiatic language family.
-
B.
Proto-Chadic
Proto-Chadic is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Chadic branch of the Afroasiatic language family, from which languages like Dass are believed to have descended.
-
C.
Proto-Mari
Proto-Mari is the reconstructed ancestral language from which the modern Hill Mari language developed.
-
D.
Proto-Tyrsenian
Proto-Tyrsenian is the hypothesized common ancestor language of the Tyrsenian family, believed to underlie languages such as Lemnian and Etruscan in the ancient Mediterranean region.
-
E.
Proto-Gur
Proto-Gur is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Gur languages of West Africa, inferred through comparative linguistic analysis.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da882448190a82ea962fe343b79 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e156d0d55c8190af59ff169e8add78 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffb5beabbc8190977f14c1b3ccdf29 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:53 a.m.