Triple
T15934356
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jaleo by José Andrés |
E386401
|
entity |
| Predicate | serviceOption |
P81473
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dine-in |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dine-in | Statement: [Jaleo by José Andrés, serviceOption, dine-in]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: serviceOption Context triple: [Jaleo by José Andrés, serviceOption, dine-in]
-
A.
serviceWith
Indicates that one entity provides or is associated with a particular service offered to or used by another entity.
-
B.
serviceIn
Indicates that one entity serves, operates, or performs its function within the context, scope, or domain of another entity.
-
C.
serviceVariantOf
chosen
Indicates that one service is a variant or alternative version of another, typically differing in configuration, features, or options while serving a similar core function.
-
D.
serviceIs
Indicates that one entity functions as a service of a specified type or category in relation to another entity.
-
E.
serviceFor
Indicates that one entity provides a service or performs functions on behalf of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da750008190987eb26be3f6c118 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e17d4d08f481909f38b75e3f42d9ab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142d37cd88190ab50760f1783e20c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:53 a.m.