Triple

T15922288
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Open de France E386120 entity
Predicate recordToPar P120549 FINISHED
Object −21 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: −21 | Statement: [Open de France, recordToPar, −21]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recordToPar
Context triple: [Open de France, recordToPar, −21]
  • A. recordProducer
    Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating or overseeing the production of a recorded work associated with another entity.
  • B. recordsType
    Indicates that one entity documents, stores, or keeps an official account of a particular type or category of information, event, or item.
  • C. recordStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of a record within a system or process (e.g., active, inactive, pending, or archived).
  • D. recordKeeper
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is responsible for maintaining, managing, or preserving official records or documented information about another entity or activity.
  • E. recordStructure
    Indicates a relationship where an entity defines, organizes, or specifies the internal layout and components of a record or data structure.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da686e4819097cbf3b1fc2d881d completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e172b48b308190bc430b2308cbc75b completed April 16, 2026, 11:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e142cf5c548190a931f7b58144cd31 completed April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e172b213e481909ee0c05e16229a26 completed April 16, 2026, 11:37 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:52 a.m.