Triple

T15916788
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Delaware Court of Chancery E385988 entity
Predicate usesRemedies P13744 FINISHED
Object equitable remedies LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equitable remedies | Statement: [Delaware Court of Chancery, usesRemedies, equitable remedies]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesRemedies
Context triple: [Delaware Court of Chancery, usesRemedies, equitable remedies]
  • A. hasRemedy
    Indicates that one entity serves as a remedy, treatment, or corrective measure for a problem, condition, or undesirable state associated with another entity.
  • B. usesTreatment
    Indicates that one entity applies or employs a particular treatment or therapeutic method on or for another entity.
  • C. remedySought
    Indicates that a particular legal or corrective action is being requested as a solution or relief in response to a problem or dispute.
  • D. typeOfRemedy chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of remedy in relation to another entity.
  • E. remedy
    Indicates that one entity serves to cure, alleviate, or counteract a problem, illness, or undesirable condition affecting another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da686e4819097cbf3b1fc2d881d completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e172b48b308190bc430b2308cbc75b completed April 16, 2026, 11:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e142cf5c548190a931f7b58144cd31 completed April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:52 a.m.