Triple
T15916750
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Delaware public school authorities |
E385987
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalFindingAgainst |
P107431
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unconstitutional inequality of segregated schools in Gebhart v. Belton |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unconstitutional inequality of segregated schools in Gebhart v. Belton | Statement: [Delaware public school authorities, legalFindingAgainst, unconstitutional inequality of segregated schools in Gebhart v. Belton]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalFindingAgainst Context triple: [Delaware public school authorities, legalFindingAgainst, unconstitutional inequality of segregated schools in Gebhart v. Belton]
-
A.
judicialFinding
chosen
Indicates a formal determination or conclusion reached by a judicial authority regarding facts, law, or liability in a legal matter.
-
B.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
C.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
D.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da686e4819097cbf3b1fc2d881d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e172b48b308190bc430b2308cbc75b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142cf5c548190a931f7b58144cd31 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:52 a.m.