Triple
T1591615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Operation Freedom’s Sentinel |
E34188
|
entity |
| Predicate | conclusionReason |
P24494
|
FINISHED |
| Object | withdrawal of most U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: withdrawal of most U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021 | Statement: [Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, conclusionReason, withdrawal of most U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusionReason Context triple: [Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, conclusionReason, withdrawal of most U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021]
-
A.
statedReason
chosen
Indicates that one entity expresses or provides another entity as the explanation, justification, or motive for an action, event, or claim.
-
B.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
-
C.
typicalConclusion
Indicates that one entity is the usual or expected outcome, result, or ending that follows from another entity or situation.
-
D.
reasoningSummary
Indicates that an entity provides a condensed explanation or overview of the reasoning or logical steps behind a conclusion, decision, or result.
-
E.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885fceb2c8190b47e0f7c0aefbff0 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a93aedd45c819085843ac843d640e8 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 8:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907bdc19081908c84c5c0aa09e282 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.