Triple
T15896983
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SR-91 |
E385481
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedByJurisdictionType |
P105320
|
FINISHED |
| Object | U.S. state |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. state | Statement: [SR-91, usedByJurisdictionType, U.S. state]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedByJurisdictionType Context triple: [SR-91, usedByJurisdictionType, U.S. state]
-
A.
usesJurisdictionType
chosen
Indicates that one entity applies, operates under, or is governed by a particular type or category of jurisdiction.
-
B.
hasJurisdictionalUse
Indicates that an entity has legal authority or recognized usage rights within a specific jurisdiction or territorial scope.
-
C.
usesJurisdiction
Indicates that one entity applies or operates under the legal authority or rules of a particular jurisdiction.
-
D.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
E.
associatedWithJurisdiction
Indicates that an entity has a formal or relevant connection to a particular legal or administrative jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da5b800819083a31be937d738b0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e17d4d08f481909f38b75e3f42d9ab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142ca3b208190946c3aa4c1e6087c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m.