Triple

T15886783
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject dayan E385210 entity
Predicate minimumNumberOnCourt P120936 FINISHED
Object three dayanim for standard beit din LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: three dayanim for standard beit din | Statement: [dayan, minimumNumberOnCourt, three dayanim for standard beit din]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: minimumNumberOnCourt
Context triple: [dayan, minimumNumberOnCourt, three dayanim for standard beit din]
  • A. minimumFemalePlayersOnField
    Indicates the rule that specifies the least number of female players that must be present on the field at any given time.
  • B. playerNumber
    Indicates the specific jersey or identification number assigned to a player within a team or game context.
  • C. numberOfPlayersPerTeam
    Indicates the quantity of players that are assigned to or allowed on each team in a given context.
  • D. usesNumberOfPlayersOnFieldPerTeam
    Indicates that the relationship specifies or depends on how many players each team has on the field at a given time.
  • E. playersPerSideOnField
    Indicates the number of players from each team that are simultaneously present on the field during play.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da5b800819083a31be937d738b0 completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e174de2cd48190ab18e48c9f051a2a completed April 16, 2026, 11:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e142c3e18c8190bb7b023f4a0eaebb completed April 16, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e174da2c2c819099ec46616798245a completed April 16, 2026, 11:46 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m.