Triple
T15885640
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marshall Court |
E385185
|
entity |
| Predicate | significantCase |
P4528
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Sturges v. Crowninshield
Sturges v. Crowninshield was an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited state power over bankruptcy laws by holding that state insolvency statutes could not retroactively discharge debts.
|
E1181145
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sturges v. Crowninshield | Statement: [Marshall Court, significantCase, Sturges v. Crowninshield]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sturges v. Crowninshield Context triple: [Marshall Court, significantCase, Sturges v. Crowninshield]
-
A.
Calder v. Bull
Calder v. Bull is an 1798 U.S. Supreme Court decision that defined the limited scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, holding that it applies only to criminal, not civil, laws.
-
B.
Strader v. Graham
Strader v. Graham was an 1851 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the reach of free-state laws over enslaved people who had traveled into free territory, foreshadowing the reasoning later used in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
-
C.
Shaw v. Hunt
Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
-
D.
Downes v. Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Sturges v. Crowninshield Triple: [Marshall Court, significantCase, Sturges v. Crowninshield]
Generated description
Sturges v. Crowninshield was an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited state power over bankruptcy laws by holding that state insolvency statutes could not retroactively discharge debts.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sturges v. Crowninshield Target entity description: Sturges v. Crowninshield was an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited state power over bankruptcy laws by holding that state insolvency statutes could not retroactively discharge debts.
-
A.
Calder v. Bull
Calder v. Bull is an 1798 U.S. Supreme Court decision that defined the limited scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, holding that it applies only to criminal, not civil, laws.
-
B.
Strader v. Graham
Strader v. Graham was an 1851 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the reach of free-state laws over enslaved people who had traveled into free territory, foreshadowing the reasoning later used in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
-
C.
Shaw v. Hunt
Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
-
D.
Downes v. Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da5b800819083a31be937d738b0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e1561a68d8819099e60e2f1f0db07a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffa95651f88190a9aac72a667b999f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ffaa07df788190bae67f3d9a800331 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ffaaa92a648190a09829ef3197223c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m.