Triple

T15885639
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marshall Court E385185 entity
Predicate significantCase P4528 FINISHED
Object Johnson v. M'Intosh E208937 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johnson v. M'Intosh | Statement: [Marshall Court, significantCase, Johnson v. M'Intosh]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Johnson v. M'Intosh
Context triple: [Marshall Court, significantCase, Johnson v. M'Intosh]
  • A. Johnson v. M’Intosh chosen
    Johnson v. M’Intosh is an 1823 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the doctrine that private individuals could not purchase lands directly from Native Americans, affirming federal supremacy over Indian land transactions and shaping American property and Indigenous land rights law.
  • B. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
    Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
  • C. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
  • D. Ex parte Crow Dog
    Ex parte Crow Dog is an 1883 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by holding that federal courts lacked jurisdiction over crimes committed by one Native American against another on tribal land.
  • E. Standing Bear v. Crook
    Standing Bear v. Crook was an 1879 U.S. federal court case in which Ponca chief Standing Bear successfully argued that Native Americans are "persons" under the law and entitled to habeas corpus rights.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da5b800819083a31be937d738b0 completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e1561a68d8819099e60e2f1f0db07a completed April 16, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffa95651f88190a9aac72a667b999f completed May 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m.