Triple
T15881256
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jovian ring system |
E385078
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHaloRingShape |
P120888
|
FINISHED |
| Object | thick torus close to Jupiter |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: thick torus close to Jupiter | Statement: [Jovian ring system, hasHaloRingShape, thick torus close to Jupiter]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHaloRingShape Context triple: [Jovian ring system, hasHaloRingShape, thick torus close to Jupiter]
-
A.
hasRing
Indicates that one entity possesses, wears, or is characterized by the presence of a ring.
-
B.
hasRingComposition
Indicates that one entity is composed of, or structurally organized around, a ring-like arrangement or circular structure.
-
C.
hasRingPersonaType
Indicates that an entity’s type or role is defined specifically in the context of its ring-related persona or identity.
-
D.
hasOuterRingColor
Indicates that an entity possesses an outer ring whose color is specified by the related value or entity.
-
E.
hasRingName
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or designated by, a specific ring name.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da4e86481909f1325fdc971b5ec |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e174de2cd48190ab18e48c9f051a2a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142c3e18c8190bb7b023f4a0eaebb |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e174da2c2c819099ec46616798245a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m.