Triple
T15881246
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jovian ring system |
E385078
|
entity |
| Predicate | dustDynamics |
P120887
|
FINISHED |
| Object | influenced by Jupiter magnetic field |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: influenced by Jupiter magnetic field | Statement: [Jovian ring system, dustDynamics, influenced by Jupiter magnetic field]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dustDynamics Context triple: [Jovian ring system, dustDynamics, influenced by Jupiter magnetic field]
-
A.
hasDust
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is covered with dust.
-
B.
dustFormationObserved
Indicates that the process of dust formation has been detected or recorded as occurring.
-
C.
debrisDiskDustContent
Indicates the amount or characteristics of dust present within a debris disk surrounding an astronomical object.
-
D.
hasDustLanes
Indicates that an object exhibits distinct, lane-like regions of dust that obscure or separate its brighter components.
-
E.
hasMicroscopicDynamics
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by underlying microscopic-level behaviors, processes, or interactions that govern its dynamics.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da4e86481909f1325fdc971b5ec |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e174de2cd48190ab18e48c9f051a2a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142c3e18c8190bb7b023f4a0eaebb |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e174da2c2c819099ec46616798245a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m.