Triple

T15856842
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Potter County E384480 entity
Predicate borders P224 FINISHED
Object Carson County E257815 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carson County | Statement: [Potter County, borders, Carson County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Carson County
Context triple: [Potter County, borders, Carson County]
  • A. Carson County chosen
    Carson County is a rural county in the Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and small-town communities.
  • B. Park County
    Park County is a rural county in southwestern Montana known for its proximity to Yellowstone National Park and its scenic mountain landscapes.
  • C. Park County
    Park County is a county in northwestern Wyoming known for encompassing portions of Yellowstone National Park and its surrounding mountainous landscapes.
  • D. Garfield County
    Garfield County is a rural county in southwestern Utah known for its vast public lands, including parts of Bryce Canyon National Park and Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument.
  • E. Prescott County
    Prescott County was a former county in eastern Ontario, Canada, that later became part of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da422088190aac39e32e6c68429 completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e14cb08bd081908af2120eb2925441 completed April 16, 2026, 8:55 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffb03c8cb081908c18c7b2d143c4b4 completed May 9, 2026, 10:07 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:50 a.m.