Triple
T15837140
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Eccles |
E384012
|
entity |
| Predicate | theoreticalView |
P47920
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interactionist dualism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interactionist dualism | Statement: [John Eccles, theoreticalView, interactionist dualism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theoreticalView Context triple: [John Eccles, theoreticalView, interactionist dualism]
-
A.
viewOnTheories
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds or expresses a particular perspective, stance, or opinion regarding one or more theories.
-
B.
theoreticalInspiration
Indicates that one entity serves as a conceptual or intellectual source of ideas, models, or frameworks that inform or shape the theory or approach of another entity.
-
C.
theorized
Indicates that one entity has proposed or developed a theoretical explanation or hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
-
D.
theoreticalTradition
Indicates that one entity belongs to, is framed within, or is analyzed according to the theoretical tradition represented by the other entity.
-
E.
theoreticalText
Indicates that one entity is a theoretical or conceptual written work about, or used as a basis for understanding, the other entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da34c888190976e06c4019d415a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e142e1fcd48190bcb884f6c65db847 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e005418f588190824d91ff7974dada |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:49 a.m.